Pre-flight programme No Sirona satellite is under contract or operational. View current status
Analyst conducting a representative offline evidence-verification workflow
Controlled Sirona concept. Representative offline evidence-verification workflow; no customer data, operational result, third-party acceptance or Sirona facility is claimed.

Evidence ledger

Public evidence.
Clear programme boundaries.

This record distinguishes implemented software, internal analysis, proposed spacecraft architecture and external validation still required.

Public ledger updated 5 August 2026

Implemented

Implemented mission software

Ground Alpha packages a task, observations, orbit estimate, uncertainty, alerts and source hashes into a signed result that a verifier can check. The wider workspace includes secure mission operations, communications, command-policy and flight-software components.

  • Runnable code and automated tests are present in the local workspace.
  • Performance claims remain limited to controlled internal scenarios.
  • The software is not represented as flight qualified, production deployed or customer accepted.
Internal evidence

Internal analytical evidence

Engineering trades, physics checks, synthetic source injection, architecture, requirements, verification planning and commercial packages exist under configuration control.

  • These records support programme decisions.
  • They do not substitute for supplier, bench, real-sky, regulator or flight evidence.
Proposed

Proposed spacecraft architecture

The current design baseline is a GEO custody payload on a dedicated partner spacecraft. ADR-002 proposes a route toward an acquired reference asset, GEO-1, Scout-0, Fusion pathfinders and later mission-specific capacity.

  • No Sirona spacecraft is contracted, built, launched, commissioned or operational.
  • No supplier, launch, licence, customer, financing or constellation commitment is claimed.
Open

External validation still required

The next programme value comes from evidence that cannot be created by another document or synthetic run.

  • Named customer decision and accepted success test
  • Multi-night real-sky GEO campaign and independent truth comparison
  • Representative processor, secure element and FlatSat fault testing
  • Supplier quotations and controlled interfaces
  • Regulatory, spectrum, remote-sensing, export and insurance records
  • Integrated schedule, finance case, environmental evidence and flight release

Public claim rule

A design target remains a target until the stated evidence closes it.

This applies to performance, timing, availability, cost, 20 times advantage, customer value and asset ownership.

Begin with a private conversation

Request supporting evidence or a technical review.

A private review can map each material statement to its source, evidence grade, limitation and next closing action.